Post by Anja Nieser on Sept 12, 2006 23:32:06 GMT -5
Judge rules state execution plan still unacceptable
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Missouri officials must revise the
state's death penalty procedures to better ensure that the three-drug
execution method does not violate the constitutional guarantee against
cruel and unusual punishment.
U.S. District Judge Fernando Gaitan in Kansas City gave the state until
Oct. 27 to submit a new protocol for executing inmates.
This will be the 2nd revision the state has given Gaitan since he ordered
in June that the Missouri Department of Corrections make sweeping changes
to its execution protocol.
At issue is how painful execution from lethal injection can be. If a
thingytail of drugs is not given correctly, an inmate could be in
"torturous" pain but paralyzed and unable to show it, Gaitan ruled.
In his ruling Tuesday, Gaitan laid out eight provisions the state must
meet to make its execution protocol acceptable. He pointed out the state
has already met some of them.
Missouri Attorney General Jay Nixon's office was reviewing Gaitan's ruling
and would not comment, said spokesman Scott Holste. Department of
Corrections spokesman Brian Hauswirth also said the department was
reviewing the ruling and its legal options and will work with the attorney
general's office on how best to continue.
"The department has said and continues to say that our execution procedure
is humane and constitutional," Hauswirth said. "We believe the court's
order imposes requirements that go beyond what is necessary for an
execution to comply with constitutional standards."
The case arose when convicted murderer Michael Taylor sued the state,
claiming his scheduled execution in February would be unconstitutionally
cruel.
Taylor's attorney Eric Berger also would not comment because the case is
still pending.
Gaitan ruled in favor of the state on one point, backtracking on his
previous order for Missouri to hire a board-certified anesthesiologist to
mix the lethal drugs and to administer or monitor the execution process.
State officials said they couldn't find an anesthesiologist for the job.
Instead, the state suggested hiring a specially trained physician to
oversee the process.
Gaitan said in the ruling he would accept that plan, but that the state
must select a physician in good standing with the Missouri licensing board
and who has not faced any disciplinary action from the board.
Gaitan specifically ruled that the state could not use its previous
medical expert, Jefferson City surgeon Alan Doerhoff. Gaitan said Doerhoff
- identified as "John Doe No. 1" in court papers - could not participate
"in any manner, at any level, in the State of Missouri's lethal injection
process."
Doerhoff stoked Gaitan's concerns over Missouri's executions when he
acknowledged in court he is dyslexic, but still oversaw executions and
determined dosages of drugs used for lethal injection.
Doerhoff's identity is kept secret in court documents, but he has since
acknowledged he assisted in dozens of executions.
In July, Doerhoff told The Associated Press he felt obligated to help the
state. He also denied he is dyslexic.
(source: Associated Press)
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Missouri officials must revise the
state's death penalty procedures to better ensure that the three-drug
execution method does not violate the constitutional guarantee against
cruel and unusual punishment.
U.S. District Judge Fernando Gaitan in Kansas City gave the state until
Oct. 27 to submit a new protocol for executing inmates.
This will be the 2nd revision the state has given Gaitan since he ordered
in June that the Missouri Department of Corrections make sweeping changes
to its execution protocol.
At issue is how painful execution from lethal injection can be. If a
thingytail of drugs is not given correctly, an inmate could be in
"torturous" pain but paralyzed and unable to show it, Gaitan ruled.
In his ruling Tuesday, Gaitan laid out eight provisions the state must
meet to make its execution protocol acceptable. He pointed out the state
has already met some of them.
Missouri Attorney General Jay Nixon's office was reviewing Gaitan's ruling
and would not comment, said spokesman Scott Holste. Department of
Corrections spokesman Brian Hauswirth also said the department was
reviewing the ruling and its legal options and will work with the attorney
general's office on how best to continue.
"The department has said and continues to say that our execution procedure
is humane and constitutional," Hauswirth said. "We believe the court's
order imposes requirements that go beyond what is necessary for an
execution to comply with constitutional standards."
The case arose when convicted murderer Michael Taylor sued the state,
claiming his scheduled execution in February would be unconstitutionally
cruel.
Taylor's attorney Eric Berger also would not comment because the case is
still pending.
Gaitan ruled in favor of the state on one point, backtracking on his
previous order for Missouri to hire a board-certified anesthesiologist to
mix the lethal drugs and to administer or monitor the execution process.
State officials said they couldn't find an anesthesiologist for the job.
Instead, the state suggested hiring a specially trained physician to
oversee the process.
Gaitan said in the ruling he would accept that plan, but that the state
must select a physician in good standing with the Missouri licensing board
and who has not faced any disciplinary action from the board.
Gaitan specifically ruled that the state could not use its previous
medical expert, Jefferson City surgeon Alan Doerhoff. Gaitan said Doerhoff
- identified as "John Doe No. 1" in court papers - could not participate
"in any manner, at any level, in the State of Missouri's lethal injection
process."
Doerhoff stoked Gaitan's concerns over Missouri's executions when he
acknowledged in court he is dyslexic, but still oversaw executions and
determined dosages of drugs used for lethal injection.
Doerhoff's identity is kept secret in court documents, but he has since
acknowledged he assisted in dozens of executions.
In July, Doerhoff told The Associated Press he felt obligated to help the
state. He also denied he is dyslexic.
(source: Associated Press)